On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:59:55 -0500GMT (22-8-2006, 17:59 +0200, where I
live), Jim Kyle wrote:

> On Tuesday, August 22, 2006, at 10:49:04 AM, Kitty wrote:

>> I've been trying Antispamsniper and it seems to miss about half the
>> spam.  I have it set to mark as spam if it has a score of 60.  Should
>> I be setting this much lower?  I'm not getting many false positives
>> but it is missing a lot.

> I have mine set at 55. However it takes quite a bit of training. I'm
> still getting a few undetected, but the detection rate is rapidly
> increasing. At present I'm highlighting the whole Junk folder and
> clicking the "junk" button each time I check the mail, and also
> clicking "not junk" for each good message. It's important to let it
> know what is not junk, as well as what is junk...

Mine is still at 90 from the time I used BayesFilter and it is working
like a charm.

-- 
Henk M. de Bruijn
______________________________________________________________________
The Bat! E-Mail System version 3.81.15 Beta Pro on Windows XP SP2
PGPkey at: http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0X11EECBEEB464DD0F
Gossamer Spider Web of Trust http://www.gswot.org
A progressive and innovative Web of Trust

Attachment: pgpuUeNhBVfu4.pgp
Description: PGP signature

________________________________________________
Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to