Hello Peter, On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 18:08:05 +0200 GMT (15/09/2006, 23:08 +0700 GMT), Peter Meyns wrote:
S>> If Voyager can't be run unencrypted, can TB be run portable? PM> The latter is probably more difficult, as The Bat! stores a lot of PM> settings in the registry. But then, as we see with Voyager, this isn't PM> impossible. For now I think, the easier way for RIT would be to allow PM> to install Voyager without encryption. I think TheBatch(http://allbat.info/index.php?1131389177) or DynBat (http://www.thebatworld.de/system/sections/index.php?op=viewarticle&artid=120) could help. A bit of a comparison of the two in the form of a TBUDL thread is here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg83190.html -- Cheers, Thomas. No electrons were harmed in the creation, transmission or reading of this email. However, many were excited and some may well have enjoyed the experience. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 3.85.03 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 ________________________________________________ Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
