> Thunderbird does -- at least it's readable, I don't know if it's > correct or not. When Yahoo started with the fully featured thing, I > thought it was just a pain in the ash, but later on I began to > appreciate it -- don't know if that was due to some improvements > they made.
> I have just migrated from Thunderbird to The Bat, and I expect > EVERYTHING to be better or at least as good as in Thunderbird, but > maybe that is a bit too much! They must have improved it. I used Thunderbird a couple of years ago and Yahoo "new and improved" was a mess. HTML support is fairly new with the Bat and they are working on it in the beta releases so it should get a lot better over time. Try opening the index.html file in your browser and see if that is any better. Another thing: Before the moderators get involved - they frown on "top posting" so if you reply, put your reply UNDER the quotes :) -- Rick ________________________________________________ Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
