Hello Privateofcourse, On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:22:48 +0100 GMT (15/Jun/09, 21:22 +0700 GMT), Privateofcourse wrote:
P> I've done a bit of leg work, but it seems to me that the majority P> of so-called 'SPAM blocker/stopper' solutions don't and can't P> really do anything other than allow you to manage SPAM P> after-the-fact. That is, SPAM isn't actually blocked or stopped at P> all, but is managed after it has been received. That is true, unfortunately. There are enough ways for spammers to deliver their unwanted mails. P> But nonetheless, I suspect that for some this is better than P> nothing at all. You can only filter at receiving end. P> I think the emphasis though must be on free solutions. Yes, I agree. Let people work for free, this is a centuries-old tradition. I have no idea why I pay for services, anyway. -- Cheers, Thomas. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 4.1.11 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 ________________________________________________ Current version is 4.2.9.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
