Hello tb...@thebat.,

Thursday, November 11, 2010, 7:29:31 PM, you wrote:

MP> Dear Paul,

MP> @11-Nov-2010, 12:44 +1000 (11-Nov 2:44 AM here) Paul Berger [PB] in
MP> mid:1581115022.20101111124...@optusnet.com.au said:

PB>> When sending an email to a number of people, you get the message Mail
PB>> box full. It turns out that 3 of them had full mailboxes, so none of
PB>> the messages were sent. So sent them in smaller batches.

MP> That's not what happened. The only mechanism with the power to say
MP> that a mailbox is full is that of a single recipient mailbox's
MP> server after all messages have been sent.

MP> What would have happened is that all messages were sent. Then 3 of
MP> the servers sent you back a "mailbox full" bounce. Each bounce
MP> notice would be for a single mailbox - unless some of the mailboxes
MP> were on the same server - some servers can combine multiple Non
MP> Delivery Reports. If all recipients addresses were in the To field
MP> then the NDRs you get back would requote your original To address,
MP> which could have given you the impression that none of the
MP> recipients got their message.

MP> So, when you resent the message, 12 of your recipients would have
MP> got the message twice.

MP> Another way to handle it could be to use the Mass Mailing feature of
MP> TB to send individual messages to multiple recipients.



Many thanks for the full explanation. Will look into the mass mailing
feature.


-- 



Paul

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Using The Bat! v4.2.36.4 on Windows XP
5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3          

...If a train station is where the train stops, what's a work station?


________________________________________________
Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to