No opposition from me. I think maybe only the spring container tests use
that stuff, but I'm 100% sure about that.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:tc-dev-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Geert Bevin
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 12:36 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [tc-dev] Standard included logging jars by WARBuilder
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm looking through how wars are built by our container test framework
> and I see that commons-logging and log4j are always included by
> default:
> 
>   public WARBuilder(String warFileName, File tempDir, TestConfigObject
> config) {
>     this.warFileName = warFileName;
>     this.tempDirPath = new FileSystemPath(tempDir);
>     this.testConfig = config;
> 
>     addDirectoryOrJARContainingClass(WARBuilder.class);  // test
framework
>     addDirectoryOrJARContainingClass(LogFactory.class);  // commons-
> logging
>     addDirectoryOrJARContainingClass(Logger.class);  // log4j
>   }
> 
> Shouldn't this be dependent on the container that is actually being
> tested. Afaik, nowadays, these logging jars are included in most web
> containers by default, and it's not recommended to have several of
> them in the classpath.
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> Geert
> 
> --
> Geert Bevin
> Terracotta - http://www.terracotta.org
> Uwyn "Use what you need" - http://uwyn.com
> RIFE Java application framework - http://rifers.org
> Music and words - http://gbevin.com
> _______________________________________________
> tc-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev

_______________________________________________
tc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev

Reply via email to