Sorry, my bad. :-)
Taylor Gautier wrote: > Just to be crystal clear, they are called Configuration Modules, and > you should use that name until we officially change it to something else. > > > Eugene Kuleshov wrote: >> It is all started from the Geert's complain about use of "configuration" >> because we often that configuration trough the code. >> Personally I don't see any issue there, but for clarity we can use >> "integration" instead of "configuration", so "integration bundle". >> >> I guess "bundle" initially came from our use of OSGi and it does have >> certain recognition in the OSGi community (a good thing), while the rest >> of the world would use "plugin" (or less often "module") for the same thing. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ tc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev
