Taylor,

  config should probably don't include any implicit modules we want to 
load by default. however using properties we can allow user to tweak 
those implicit modules


Taylor Gautier wrote:
> Ok.  Well we should do these things in the config.  Properties are not 
> user facing and these sound user facing to me.
>
> Juris Galang wrote:
>   
>> I meant properties.
>>
>>
>> On Aug 20, 2007, at 10:14 AM, Taylor Gautier wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> I suppose you meant a basic set of config settings - not properties.
>>> Juris Galang wrote:
>>>       
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> We opened a new issue:
>>>> CDV-384  [ https://jira.terracotta.org/jira//browse/CDV-384?page=all ]
>>>>
>>>> In summary:
>>>> The idea is that we will have a set of basic config-bundles that 
>>>> will  always get installed and started on the L1
>>>>
>>>> The primary intent being, since there are certain configurations 
>>>> that  should always be defined when clustering with Terracotta (eg:  
>>>> obfuscated classes will always have to be excluded, certain Java  
>>>> classes that require local resources, Swing components, etc) these  
>>>> config-bundles will take care of it for the user behind-the-scenes.
>>>>
>>>> A secondary is goal here is to finally migrate most (if not all) of  
>>>> the default configurations out of the main Terracotta source tree 
>>>> and  into the config-bundles.
>>>>
>>>> Current thinking is:
>>>> - To create a set of config-bundles (as opposed to dumping 
>>>> everything  in the modules-common bundle) delineated by class, 
>>>> package,  framework, or functional concerns; Or whatever makes more 
>>>> sense, like  maybe an: always-exclude config-bundle, always-include 
>>>> config-bundle,  basic-server-setting config-bundle, basic-logging 
>>>> config-bundle, etc.
>>>> - To provide a set of Terracotta system properties to tweak which 
>>>> of  the basic config-bundles will be installed or started. Default  
>>>> setting would always ALL
>>>> - To always include these config-bundles in the kit.
>>>>
>>>> It would be nice to hear from anyone/everyone interested in shaping  
>>>> how we implement this feature.
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Juris
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> tc-dev mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev
>>>>
>>>>         
> _______________________________________________
> tc-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev
>   

_______________________________________________
tc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev

Reply via email to