On Monday 27 August 2007 4:38, Taylor Gautier wrote: > I agree with Eugene. -SNAPSHOT is required. > > What is the reasoning behind two repos? I have seen it done with other > projects, but I don't quite understand the need for it - in fact I think > it's wrong to provide multiple repos, there doesn't need to be more than > one repo (so long as you don't have name collisions, which won't happen > if you leave the SNAPSHOT identifier intact).
OK, I've set up the nightly builds so that they deploy the Maven artifacts to the snapshots repository at http://download.terracotta.org/maven2-snapshots . The -SNAPSHOT designator is being used for the core artifacts, but not for the config modules. Taylor, the reason for having a separate snapshots repo is that right now we cannot put the -SNAPSHOT designator on the config module JAR files because the modules loader doesn't currently support this naming scheme, and as you mention above we would have name collisions without this -SNAPSHOT. If or when the modules loader is enhanced to support -SNAPSHOT versioning, then we probably wouldn't need the separate repo, but someone else might be able to give other reasons for having a snapshots repo separate from the main repo. -- Jason Voegele Coming together is a beginning; keeping together is progress; working together is success. _______________________________________________ tc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev
