We should be careful about combining those concepts. Don't want to  
end up with a super API of a bunch
of random gunk.

On Sep 25, 2007, at 9:55 AM, Juris Galang wrote:

>> I think (please correct me Juris) that the "api" consists of common-
>> api, dso-l1-api, and thirdparty-api and this api is that subset of
>> stuff exposed to config module implementors.
>
> Correct. Initially, the idea was that the API would be aimed at
> config module developers, but there's no reason why it shouldn't be
> useful for other types of projects.
>
> On Sep 25, 2007, at 8:10 AM, Alex Miller wrote:
>
>> I suspect the answer is yes to both but it depends what you mean by
>> internal and external?
>>
>> common-api will be exposed to implementors of config modules.  Is
>> that an internal or external usage?
>>
>> I think (please correct me Juris) that the "api" consists of common-
>> api, dso-l1-api, and thirdparty-api and this api is that subset of
>> stuff exposed to config module implementors.
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Steven Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: [email protected]
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 10:06:06 AM (GMT-0600) America/
>> Chicago
>> Subject: Re: [tc-dev] TC system properties
>>
>> Is common-API for internal API's or external Api's?
>>
>> On Sep 25, 2007, at 8:01 AM, Alex Miller wrote:
>>
>>> Seems like a good idea, but I would think common-api would be  
>>> better.
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Geert Bevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 9:46:52 AM (GMT-0600) America/
>>> Chicago
>>> Subject: [tc-dev] TC system properties
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I was just reading through the source code and I noticed that the
>>> system properties that are supported by Terracotta are really
>>> scattered around the code base. Wouldn't it be good to create a
>>> TerracottaProperties interface in the 'common' project that
>>> consolidates all these property names as constants? Is 'common' the
>>> correct project for this? Do all the other DSO projects depend on  
>>> it?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Geert
>>>
>>> --
>>> Geert Bevin
>>> Terracotta - http://www.terracotta.org
>>> Uwyn "Use what you need" - http://uwyn.com
>>> RIFE Java application framework - http://rifers.org
>>> Music and words - http://gbevin.com
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> tc-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> tc-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> tc-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> tc-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> tc-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev

_______________________________________________
tc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev

Reply via email to