Alex Miller wrote: > Regarding Jupiter, I wish I had my notes as I had several specific > objections, which I now only vaguely recall. I think not only did it require > you to check in the review files, it also modified the .project or other > eclipse project settings, can't remember exactly. I don't like that latter > as it junks up the project files for others not using Jupiter. And the > former seems like there is a question as to how long you keep those files > around. > > Reviews could only be associated with a single Eclipse project at a time, > which seemed highly annoying in our environment, where many (most?) reviews > cross projects. > > They seem to have a fairly rigid proces in mind that requires a fair amount > of form filling. Maybe this was just a "feel" thing. > > It didn't seem unworkable, just not worth the effort over just looking at > code with other people on a conf call and/or reviewing diffs. I'd be willing > to give it another shot if people were interested. > > Eugene, do you have any experience using it? I don't know anyone actively > using Jupiter but I'd be interested to hear reports. > No, I haven't got any experience with it.
regards, Eugene _______________________________________________ tc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev
