Guys, the FinegrainedLockNoDso class returns false on tryLock() methods, hence breaking my unit tests: is there any reason for that behavior? It's just a kind of stub, so I think it wouldn't be harmful to return true, other than be more consistent with lock() methods which are no-ops.
What do you think? On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Alex Miller <amil...@terracottatech.com> wrote: > Hey Sergio, > > Tim rightly pointed at ConcurrentDistributedMap.createFinegrainedLock(K) > which will return you a FineGrainedLock object (with tryLock methods) that > lets you accomplish the equivalent of tryLockEntry(). Is that sufficient? > > http://forge.terracotta.org/releases/projects/tim-concurrent-collections-root/apidocs/org/terracotta/collections/ConcurrentDistributedMap.html > http://forge.terracotta.org/releases/projects/tim-concurrent-collections-root/apidocs/org/terracotta/collections/FinegrainedLock.html > > Alex > > > On Nov 11, 2009, at 12:21 PM, Alex Miller wrote: > >> 3.2 is probably end of year-ish timeframe, depending on what ends up going >> in it and holidays, etc. >> >> >> On Nov 11, 2009, at 11:16 AM, Sergio Bossa wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Alex Miller <amil...@terracottatech.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Given those alternatives, I'd much rather add a tryLockEntry() :) Let >>>> me >>>> discuss with some people here internally and see whether we can add this >>>> for >>>> the 3.2 release train. >>> >>> Great, what's the planned release time for 3.2? >>> >>>> I'll leave the interrupt question to Chris (who is out today) since he >>>> just >>>> rewrote the client lock manager. In this case, I think you're >>>> performing a >>>> blocking lock operation so I don't believe it should/would respond to >>>> interrupt. >>> >>> Okay, I'm adding Chris to this thread. >>> >>>> BTW, you might want to try out some of your perf tests with the current >>>> trunk - server guys have made some insane improvements in the last few >>>> weeks >>>> in prep for 3.2 plus the new lock mgr is a big improvement, particularly >>>> on >>>> read locks and lock memory footprint. >>> >>> Very cool: I'll give it a try in a few days. >>> >>> Thanks for your support, >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Sergio B. >>> >>> -- >>> Sergio Bossa >>> Software Passionate and Open Source Enthusiast. >>> URL: http://www.linkedin.com/in/sergiob >> >> _______________________________________________ >> tc-forge-dev mailing list >> tc-forge-...@lists.terracotta.org >> http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-forge-dev > > -- Sergio Bossa Software Passionate and Open Source Enthusiast. URL: http://www.linkedin.com/in/sergiob _______________________________________________ tc-dev mailing list tc-dev@lists.terracotta.org http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev
