Thanks to Chris' remarks I indeed realized I could erase ReadLock, WriteLock and ReadWriteLock, doing that now and committing soon after running the tests.
On 20 May 2010, at 19:48, Chris Dennis wrote: > newCondition() is allowed to throw UnsupportedOperationException which > is what RRWL read locks do... > > which if ReadLock is just Lock means ReadWriteLock can go away as well. > > Right? > > Chris > > On May 20, 2010, at 1:44 PM, Geert Bevin wrote: > >> Only the WriteLock is the same and extends Lock as such. ReadLock >> isn't able to create a condition ... and I explained about the others. >> >> On 20 May 2010, at 19:43, Chris Dennis wrote: >> >>> How different are our *Lock interfaces from their JDK equivalents? >>> Can we just use the JDK ones instead? >> >> -- >> Geert Bevin >> Terracotta - http://www.terracotta.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> tc-dev mailing list >> tc-dev@lists.terracotta.org >> http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev > > _______________________________________________ > tc-dev mailing list > tc-dev@lists.terracotta.org > http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev -- Geert Bevin Terracotta - http://www.terracotta.org _______________________________________________ tc-dev mailing list tc-dev@lists.terracotta.org http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev
