Yes, thats what I would suggest as well - its a wart, but not one we
can't live with...
Chris
On Jun 3, 2010, at 11:19 AM, Geert Bevin wrote:
> Do you think we should tackle this now or in a future release? I'd
> be inclined to leave things as-is, hide the methods from the
> Javadocs, and focus on completing what's there in terms of tests and
> docs. What do you think?
>
> On 03 Jun 2010, at 17:08, Chris Dennis wrote:
>
>> Yes... that would be good!
>>
>> On Jun 3, 2010, at 11:08 AM, Geert Bevin wrote:
>>
>>> I wasn't aware of this, imho we should go the other way and make the
>>> orphaned values work without having to iterate through the
>>> constituent maps.
>>>
>>> On 03 Jun 2010, at 17:03, Chris Dennis wrote:
>>>
>>>> Currently if you want to get the keys for orphaned values on a CDM
>>>> you
>>>> have to do:
>>>>
>>>> Set<K> allKeys = new HashSet<K>();
>>>> for (Map<K,V> m : map.getConstituentMaps()) {
>>>> allKeys.add(clusterInfo.getKeysForOrphanedValues(m));
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> I was just suggesting that one thing we could do is get rid of
>>>> TCMap,
>>>> and make users do this for the local keys method too.
>
> --
> Geert Bevin
> Terracotta - http://www.terracotta.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> tc-dev mailing list
> tc-dev@lists.terracotta.org
> http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev
_______________________________________________
tc-dev mailing list
tc-dev@lists.terracotta.org
http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev
