Hi all, The European funded project LiquidPub [*] seems a good way to get quick and interactive feedback (I've already participated to such initiative [**]). The idea would be to organize virtual conferences then to submit mature papers to journals/reviews.
Regards, Reda * http://liquidpub.org/ ** http://www.interdisciplines.org/conferences/Workshop-on-Trust-and-Reputation Le 03/11/11 09:45, Pars Mutaf a écrit : > Hi Usman, > > The method you are suggesting means that we need to wait 6 months for > feedback (3-5 reviews). > > Pars > > On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Usman > Ashraf<[email protected]>wrote: > >> Dear All, >> >> Is there a point that I'm missing? why don't we just submit our work to a >> reputed journal for feedback? >> Most reputed journals don't charge anything, don't cost as much as >> conferences and provide us with a decent feedback. >> >> regards >> Usman. >> >>> Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 09:43:11 +0200 >>> From: [email protected] >>> To: [email protected] >>> CC: [email protected] >>> Subject: [Tccc] Requesting open feedback to my work (Re: Promoting open >> on-line research) >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Could you please send feedback for the following work. I don't want to >>> submit it to conferences just for feedback. I would therefore need your >>> opinion: >>> >>> http://arxiv.org/abs/1103.5115 >>> >>> Or, please point me to me to a list working on this kind of topic. >>> >>> Pars >>> >>> PS: Based on the below idea, this is a test for open research. >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Joe Touch<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On 11/1/2011 11:37 PM, Pars Mutaf wrote: >>>> ... >>>> >>>> Conferences may have the benefits that are listed above. The problem is >>>>> being tied to conferences just for receiving feedback. >>>>> >>>> It's useful to appreciate that it has always been possible to write >> drafts >>>> and tech reports and post them - either via direct email, or to lists* >> for >>>> discussion or feedback. >>>> >>>> *This list in particular is intended for exactly this kind of >> discussion; >>>> we are often overrun with CFPs, but they is NOT the primary motivation >> for >>>> this list.* >>>> >>>> Joe (TCCC Chair) >>>> >>>> *it's more useful to post only the abstract, not the full text or PDF >> FWIW. >>>> *there are many IEEE Comsoc TCs; it's always useful to post your ideas >> to >>>> the TC most specific to your work. >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> IEEE Communications Society Tech. Committee on Computer Communications >>> (TCCC) - for discussions on computer networking and communication. >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/tccc > _______________________________________________ > IEEE Communications Society Tech. Committee on Computer Communications > (TCCC) - for discussions on computer networking and communication. > [email protected] > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/tccc > -- M. Reda Yaich Chercheur en formation, Phd Student Multi-Agent Systems ISCOD - LSTI - Henri Fayol Institute Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines Saint-Etienne Soyez éco-responsables ! N'imprimez ce mail qu'en cas de besoin. _______________________________________________ IEEE Communications Society Tech. Committee on Computer Communications (TCCC) - for discussions on computer networking and communication. [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/tccc
