Sorry, you are quite correct; I was not clear. When I refered to "Jiang's
patch," I actually meant "the patch at
http://www.mail-archive.com/tcljava@scriptics.com/msg00598/tclblend.patch, plus
Jiang's suggestion to remove the monitor calls from JAVA_LOCK and JAVA_UNLOCK."
Thank you for allowing me to clarify that.
Jiang Wu wrote:
> A small correction. My patch does NOT remove the monitor calls in
> JAVA_LOCK/JAVA_UNLOCK. The patch fixes problems encountered if you load Tcl
> into a running JVM, which is the opposite way of using TclBlend comparing
> how you are using TclBlend.
>
> I also think removing all instances of MonitorEnter and MonitorExit from the
> TclBlend code should not do any harm.
>
> -- Jiang Wu
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dr Wes Munsil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 9:50 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Tcl Java] what I now know about the deadlock
>
> 2) Although Jiang's patch removes the MonitorEnter and MonitorExit calls
> from JAVA_LOCK and JAVA_UNLOCK, there are still other calls of
----------------------------------------------------------------
The TclJava mailing list is sponsored by Scriptics Corporation.
To subscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the word SUBSCRIBE as the subject.
To unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the word UNSUBSCRIBE as the subject.
To send to the list, send email to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.
An archive is available at http://www.mail-archive.com/tcljava@scriptics.com
