> From: Laurence Anthony [mailto:anthony0...@gmail.com]
> I think redundancy is the key to documentation. Even if > Tkx::eval() is just like any other Tkx::foo if it's useful, > then it would be nice to have in the documentation, even if > just as an example of how powerful Tkx::foo can be. sure. > We also need to generate a strong Tkx community (to cover > cases not in the documentation). I think the fact that > there's isn't a proper Tkx discussion group is a serious > problem. Why isn't one created? A first good step would be to > at least explain in the documentation where people should > post questions about Tkx. (Is the tcltk mailing list the right place?) yes, the tcltk mailing list is the right place. Currently it is agreed that it serves for both developer and user discussion for Tcl.pm, Tkx and Tcl::Tk. Well, thank you in advance for fruitful participation :) BR, Vadim.
