> From: John Cerney [mailto:john.cer...@gmail.com]
> It looks like the changes I have made don't really fit into your > vision for where the Tcl::Tk package should go. It probably makes more > sense for me to release the changes as a separate package (probably > named Tcl::pTk) as I mentioned earlier. I hope you can support that. I am not the only one who decides, and I think the idea of yet another same module would be considered as not a good one, unfortunately. I propose following approach - I'll change Tcl/Tk.pm to have a hash-based object, so it will be compatible with your other compatibility part, and then I will release it as next release. Then, we could decide on how to apply next. So this will hopefully allow to move forward. Regards, Vadim.
