Thanks for pointing this out. Hi Jeff, What would be your best recommendation on the matter? IMO there are plenty of alternatives to ActiveTCL only because ActiveTCL (together with its teacup) became harder to use, therefore lot of binary builds have appeared: IronTCL, BAWT, etc.
Should we recommend to BAWT to Tck::pTk users? -----Original Message----- From: Christopher Chavez <chrischa...@gmx.us> Sent: Monday, May 13, 2019 2:23 AM To: tcltk@perl.org Subject: Likely Tcl.pm issue on PerlMonks [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Just want to share a recent question I found on PerlMonks, in case anyone else wants to take a look or can help: https://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=1233609 The user was initially trying to get Tkx working with DWIM Perl + ActiveTcl but the error looks like it might be coming from Tcl.pm — “failed dlopen(…)”.
