On 11/23/2019 5:04 AM, Dave Howorth wrote: > Many thanks. I don't suppose there's a reason your pull request > hasn't been accepted yet.
The pull request belongs to someone else (Maximilian Lika). Tkx has been dormant for several years, although it still works well with newer upstream Tcl/Tk versions. On 11/23/2019 2:01 PM, Konovalov, Vadim wrote: > IMO taking ownership on the module is the way to go, if Gisle Aas isn't arguing against this In my quest for World Tk Wrapper Domination™, I actually have considered requesting comaintainer rights for Tkx when I have better availability. I haven't used Tkx for much other than comparison against Tcl::(p)Tk, but I don't really have any objections to its syntax (especially with the availability of a relatively modern tutorial on TkDocs.com), and I'd be in favor of creating maintenance releases to reassure users it isn't completely abandoned or broken. Christopher A. Chavez
