Ah, in that case the resolution would be clear to me. Anyone who misquotes or otherwise falsifies another's words in a debate forfeits the entire arguement on the grounds of "intellectual sliminess." And I think that is a good answer to your original question as well. :)
Gene Kim-Eng ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lisa Gielczyk (TCP)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > My husband was having a discussion with someone who said something to > the > effect of, "I think I'm starting to agree with you, but what do you > make of > this article?" When Alan read the article, which quoted a sermon, he > looked > up the sermon and found that the quote had been misconstrued. We were > looking for a name for what had been done so he could explain why the > article really didn't say what it appeared to say on first read. > Copyright > fit, and the information about the Berne convention was interesting > and > helpful, as well. ______________________________________________ Author Help files and create printed documentation with Doc-To-Help. New release adds Team Authoring Support, enhanced Web-based help technology and PDF output. Learn more at www.doctohelp.com/tcp. Interactive 3D Documentation Parts catalogs, animated instructions, and more. www.i3deverywhere.com _______________________________________________ Technical Communication Professionals Post a message to the list: email [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, unsubscribe, archives, account options, list info: http://techcommpros.com/mailman/listinfo/tcp_techcommpros.com Subscribe (email): send a blank message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe (email): send a blank message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Need help? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get the TCP whole experience! http://www.techcommpros.com
