Gianluca Varenni wrote: > > I would probably get rid of the old releases, putting them in an > archive folder (like I do for WinPcap). Also, I would rename the > "TCPDUMP 3.9 / LIBPCAP 0.9" section specifying the specific version > 3.9.8/0.9.8. (The current title is kinda confusing for me). >
I agree. I didn't get rid of those old releases because I thought people would want them to stay (as the previous version had so many old releases listed). I guess there no point on listing releases from year 2004, 2003... > > Would it be possible to fix such archives? > It would be great to have the archives back online but I have no idea if that's possible. Anyone? >> -> Added section "Patches, Bug Reports and Feature Requests", where the >> visitor is pointed to the resources at Sourceforge. >> > > Who gets notified about bug reports on sourceforge? the notifications > don't seem to reach the mailing list, so it looks like the bugs report > on sourceforge is a sort of black hole... > The people that is listed as project admins are: Michael Richardson, Guy Harris and Bill Fenner*. *I guess all of them get a copy of the bug submission report. However, I agree with you, it would be nice if those reports were also sent to the list. Is this possible? I've updated the page again. Check it out at http://www.tcpdump.org/index2.html an let me know what you think. Regards, Luis. - This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
