On Nov 24, 2014, at 7:01 PM, Michael Richardson <m...@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> okay, can we start again.
> I would appreciate some clear data and clear complaints.
>
> This is what I heard:
> a) which is "master", bpf or github?
> b) bpf is unreliable.
> c) there is some issue (please explain more) with bpf.tcpdump.org
> experiencing auto-merging difficulties.
> d) this CVE process has been botched (I said this, and I take
> responsability for this)
e) for whatever reason, changes being checked into bpf.tcpdump.org
haven't recently been getting pushed to/pulled by GitHub.
If that were fixed, that might help with issue a).
There's also
f) fixes checked into GitHub (including pull requests) have to be
manually pulled to bpf.tcpdump.org, and the people checking them in aren't
always doing that at the time they check fixes in
and fixing that might also help with issue a). I don't know what the issues
are in c), so I don't know whether that'd help there.
I'll let others address b).
_______________________________________________
tcpdump-workers mailing list
tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org
https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
