Yes, absolutely. Thank you!
> On 2 Dec 2017, at 18:56, Guy Harris <g...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > > On Dec 2, 2017, at 4:06 AM, Anton Glukhov <anton.a.gluk...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> You are right, “express" packet is exactly the same as “ordinary”. From my >> point of view it’s ok to show express traffic as part of preemption traffic, >> hence I’d like to see Express packets in favour of “ordinary” one. Anyway I >> guess If we choose specific link type for 802.1qbu & 802.1br it would be the >> “context” in which “ordinary” traffic is called “express” packets. > > OK, so we'll have LINKTYPE_ETHERNET_MPACKET/DLT_ETHERNET_MPACKET, specified > as: > > mPackets, as specified by IEEE 802.3br Figure 99-4, starting with the > preamble and always ending with a CRC field > > Does that make sense? _______________________________________________ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
