On May 12, 2019, at 1:48 PM, Damir Franusic <damir.franu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That would be great thanks. That's all I ever wanted really, but now I
> understand the relevance of having a proper I-D.
It will also be useful for documenting the protocol when run over SCTP.
Are you planning on running the protocol through the IETF standards process:
https://www.ietf.org/standards/process/
or did you just use the I-D format for convenience (or because that's how the
pcapng spec is being done - we may submit it as an I-D at some point)?
> And yes, you are correct regarding the Header/PDU; quite simple.
Great - thanks! So shall we link to that draft, for now?
_______________________________________________
tcpdump-workers mailing list
tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org
https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
