--- Begin Message ---
> On 21. Mar 2020, at 23:10, Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> wrote:
>
>
> Guy Harris via tcpdump-workers <tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org> wrote:
>> Currently, on GitHub, there's a "pcapng" team:
>> https://github.com/pcapng
>
>> with one repository containing the pcapng specification, and a
>> "the-tcpdump-group" team:
>
>> https://github.com/the-tcpdump-group
>> with repositories for libpcap, tcpdump, and the tcpdump.org Web site.
>
>> It makes sense to me to keep those specifications on a site such as
>> GitHub; GitHub comes to mind first because that's where pcapng
>> currently is.
>
>> 1) add them as repositories to the pcapng team;
>
>> 1) has the slight disadvantage that the name for the team suggests it's
>> for pcapng only; it appears that teams can be renamed:
>
> ...
>
>> Were we to rename it, I don't know what would be a good new name.
>
> I'm good with pcapng, because I also have no other suggestion.
> I would like to restart the opsawg work on an IETF specification for this.
I would support this. However, last time I tried this, I was not successful.
There were not very interested in defining a file format...
Maybe things have changed, but I don't know.
Best regards
Michael
>
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
> -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-...@wireshark.org>
> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
tcpdump-workers mailing list
tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org
https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
