Ok Pada Sel, 19 Nov 2024, 05.29, Gerald Combs <ger...@wireshark.org> menulis:
> On 11/18/24 9:08 AM, Michael Richardson wrote: > > > > The message about the spam was in fact spam. > > But, it forged a valid From: so it got through. > > > > I'd like to fix the SPF/DKIM/spam-filter such that it more aggressively > kills > > this kind of forgery, assuming that wireshark.org has the right > policies set. > > This kind of thing is fraught with false-positives, but there are some > > reasonable howtos. > > wireshark.org should have valid SPF and DKIM records. If the problem is > limited to my address, I can subscribe from another one and you can just > block my wireshark.org address if that's easier. > _______________________________________________ > tcpdump-workers mailing list -- tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org > To unsubscribe send an email to tcpdump-workers-le...@lists.tcpdump.org > %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s > _______________________________________________ tcpdump-workers mailing list -- tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org To unsubscribe send an email to tcpdump-workers-le...@lists.tcpdump.org %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s
