Would it be better to split ether_if_print(), and allow ISL packets
to recurse into ether_if_print2()?
+ p += 12;
..
+ caplen -= (16 + ETHER_HDRLEN);
+ length -= (16 + ETHER_HDRLEN);
+ p += ETHER_HDRLEN;
Why 12 + ETHER_HDRLEN vs. 16 + ETHER_HDRLEN?
I started writing this code but put it in the "case OUI_CISCO:" around
line 224; was I missing something that required it being outside the
case?
Bill
-
This is the TCPDUMP workers list. It is archived at
http://www.tcpdump.org/lists/workers/index.html
To unsubscribe use mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=unsubscribe
