Hello, At 13:51 22/09/01 -0700, you wrote: >On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 05:46:32PM -0300, Mercia Eliane Bittencourt Figueredo wrote: >> [root@gandalf tcpdump-2001.09.21]# tcpdump -i atm0|more > >What does it print if you do > > tcpdump -e -i atm0 > [root@gandalf ~]# tcpdump -e -i atm0 | more tcpdump: listening on atm0 20:02:46.800000 45 00 02 1c 00 00 192.168.222.24.7000 > 192.168.211.21.rfe: rx type 0 (512) (DF) 20:02:46.800000 45 00 02 1c 00 00 192.168.222.24.7000 > 192.168.211.21.rfe: rx type 0 (512) (DF) 20:02:46.800000 45 00 02 1c 00 00 192.168.222.24.7000 > 192.168.211.21.rfe: rx type 0 (512) (DF) 20:02:46.814393 45 c0 02 38 92 1d 192.168.211.21 > 192.168.222.24: icmp: 192.168.211.21 udp port rfe unreachable [tos 0xc0] 20:02:46.820000 45 00 02 1c 00 00 192.168.222.24.7000 > 192.168.211.21.rfe: rx type 0 (512) (DF) 20:02:46.820000 45 00 02 1c 00 00 192.168.222.24.7000 > 192.168.211.21.rfe: rx type 0 (512) (DF) 20:02:46.820000 45 00 02 1c 00 00 192.168.222.24.7000 > 192.168.211.21.rfe: rx type 0 (512) (DF) 20:02:46.820000 45 00 02 1c 00 00 192.168.222.24.7000 > 192.168.211.21.rfe: rx type 0 (512) (DF) 20:02:46.820000 45 00 02 1c 00 00 192.168.222.24.7000 > 192.168.211.21.rfe: rx type 0 (512) (DF) 20:02:46.820000 45 00 02 1c 00 00 192.168.222.24.7000 > 192.168.211.21.rfe: rx type 0 (512) (DF) 20:02:46.820000 45 00 02 1c 00 00 192.168.222.24.7000 > 192.168.211.21.rfe: rx type 0 (512) (DF) 20:02:46.820000 45 00 02 1c 00 00 192.168.222.24.7000 > 192.168.211.21.rfe: rx type 0 (512) (DF) 20:02:46.820000 45 00 02 1c 00 00 192.168.222.24.7000 > 192.168.211.21.rfe: rx type 0 (512) (DF) 20:02:46.820000 45 00 02 1c 00 00 192.168.222.24.7000 > 192.168.211.21.rfe: rx type 0 (512) (DF) 20:02:46.820000 45 00 02 1c 00 00 192.168.222.24.7000 > 192.168.211.21.rfe: rx type 0 (512) (DF) 20:02:46.820000 45 00 02 1c 00 00 192.168.222.24.7000 > 192.168.211.21.rfe: rx type 0 (512) (DF) 20:02:46.820000 45 00 02 1c 00 00 192.168.222.24.7000 > 192.168.211.21.rfe: rx type 0 (512) (DF) 20:02:46.820000 45 00 02 1c 00 00 192.168.222.24.7000 > 192.168.211.21.rfe: rx type 0 (512) (DF) >If this is an ARPHRD_ATM device, tcpdump appears to handle two different >types of encapsulation - one where you have the expected 802.2 LLC >header at the beginning of the frame, and one where there's no >link-layer header at all, just an IP header. However, libpcap assumes >that the encapsulation will include the 802.2 header, so if it doesn't, >filters won't work. I am using classical IP >Unless there's some way for libpcap to determine, for a device, whether >it show an 802.2 header on snooped packets, we may have to treat this as >yet another Linux link-layer type that can only be sanely snooped in >cooked mode. > How Can I do it? Thanks very much Mercia - This is the TCPDUMP workers list. It is archived at http://www.tcpdump.org/lists/workers/index.html To unsubscribe use mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=unsubscribe
Re: [tcpdump-workers] tcpdump problem
Mercia Eliane Bittencourt Figueredo Sun, 23 Sep 2001 09:51:41 -0700
- [tcpdump-workers] tcpdump problem Mercia Eliane Bittencourt Figueredo
- Re: [tcpdump-workers] tcpdump pro... Guy Harris
- Re: [tcpdump-workers] tcpdump pro... Mercia Eliane Bittencourt Figueredo
- Re: [tcpdump-workers] tcpdump pro... Mercia Eliane Bittencourt Figueredo
- Re: [tcpdump-workers] tcpdump... Guy Harris
- Re: [tcpdump-workers] tcpdump pro... Mercia Eliane Bittencourt Figueredo
- Re: [tcpdump-workers] tcpdump... Guy Harris
- Re: [tcpdump-workers] tcpdump pro... Mercia Eliane Bittencourt Figueredo
