> > Yeah, we have the same thing in Snort but it took me quite a while to
> > realize it. My first guess was if they were going to bother doing the
> > TCP chksumming in hardware, they would be offloading IP too but so
> > much for intuition :-)

processors crunch protocol logic pretty well. what they don't do well is
access data (cache miss latencies and all that). so, the biggest bang
for the buck is for a NIC to offload those things that host cpus do
poorly. 

hence, offloading the TCP checksum.

however, IP checksum is much shorter - you would do more work to
communicate the need to the NIC than you would computing  the checksum
in the first place.

rick jones
-- 
Wisdom Teeth are impacted, people are affected by the effects of events.
these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... :)
feel free to post, OR email to raj in cup.hp.com  but NOT BOTH...
-
This is the TCPDUMP workers list. It is archived at
http://www.tcpdump.org/lists/workers/index.html
To unsubscribe use mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=unsubscribe

Reply via email to