This is normal behaviour for managed wireless networks, where the frame is
encapsulated in 802.11 both to and from the WAP. If this is a copper or fiber
net, are you certain you aren't seeing the effects of a funny
bridge/VLAN/routing environment? Are the multiples being reported with
identical timestamps? How about src MAC addresses?

g

On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 09:43:56 -0600
"Kraus, Jeffery" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> The machine is Redhat 9, and it is just receiving frames from the network.
> It does not have an IP address bound to the adaptor so it should not be
> generating any frames itself.
> 
> Here is the Kernal details:
> uname -a
> Linux usc-schaum-sniff 2.4.20-8 #1 Thu Mar 13 17:54:28 EST 2003 i686 i686
> i386 GNU/Linux
> 
> Jeffery Kraus
> Data Services Engineer
> 773.216.3179 (cell)
> 224.653.3720 (office)
> 224.653.3766 (fax)
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Guy Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 6:06 PM
> To: Kraus, Jeffery
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: [tcpdump-workers] Observing duplicate frame captures in
> TCPDUMP
> 
> 
> 
> On Dec 19, 2003, at 2:41 PM, Kraus, Jeffery wrote:
> 
> > Whenever I run captures I always get every packet displayed twice. I 
> > have
> > seen numerous emails regarding this issue, but no real fix. I am 
> > currently
> > using eth4 as the capture interface and I do not have an IP address 
> > bound to
> > it.
> 
> On what OS are you running this?
> 
> Is the machine running tcpdump sending or receiving those packets, or 
> is it just passively capturing other machines' traffic on a network?
> -
> This is the TCPDUMP workers list. It is archived at
> http://www.tcpdump.org/lists/workers/index.html
> To unsubscribe use mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
George Bakos
Institute for Security Technology Studies - IRIA
Dartmouth College
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
603.646.0665 -voice
603.646.0666 -fax
-
This is the TCPDUMP workers list. It is archived at
http://www.tcpdump.org/lists/workers/index.html
To unsubscribe use mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to