On Jan 8, 2004, at 2:23 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
If nobody objects within the next few days, let's change it.
Nobody objected, so I changed it...
However, why not just use AC_LIBOBJ, as per
...to use AC_LIBOBJ, and...
Why not just
AC_PREREQ(2.50)
as AC_LIBOBJ was apparently introduced in 2.50?
...to use AC_PREREQ(2.50).
- This is the TCPDUMP workers list. It is archived at http://www.tcpdump.org/lists/workers/index.html To unsubscribe use mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
