Hi Martin, hi all, I would like to vote for option 1 (adopt both) because I don’t think we should make an arbitrary choice here.
If we further work on both proposal, there might even be a chance to find a solution to combine the best of both… :-) …? Mirja > Am 16.07.2015 um 12:33 schrieb Martin Stiemerling <[email protected]>: > > Dear all, > > The chairs summarized the current state of the TCPINC WG with respect to the > selection of a WG protocol item in their email on 7/15. > > Up to now, the WG could not reach rough consensus if any of the current > protocol proposals can be used as the WG item. The two actively discussed > protocol proposals are: > > I) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rescorla-tcpinc-tls-option/ > II) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpcrypt/ > > The chairs passed the token to me and asked for guidance how to continue. > > Here is my guidance: > > The WG has to agree on a way forward and I have two proposed ways forward > below. > > In case, the WG cannot agree on any way forward, the WG will be still in a > deadlock. This deadlock has not been removed within the last four months. A > WG in a deadlock situation is not a WG anymore and I will close the WG, if > there is no agreement on the way forward. > > > Here are the two propposed ways forward: > > 1) As neither the protocol proposal I) nor II) is achieving rough consensus, > I propose to accept both as WG items and to let the WG work on both proposals > until the IETF-94 meeting in November 2015. The WG will evaluate both > proposals after this period and the chairs will last call to see which > protocol proposal will achieve rough consensus. > > 2) The WG will ask the responsible AD to choose either I) or II) as WG item. > The responsible AD will pick and the WG will accept the choice. > > > Please state your opinion if you are in favor of option 1) or 2) until July > 20th, 11:30 am CEST, by email to the tcpinc WG list. > > > I will ask the chairs to make a judgement at the end of the response period > on whether there is rough consensus on any of the questions. The result will > be presented in the tcpinc meeting. This meeting is being held on the same > day, July 20, at 3:20 pm CEST. > > Thanks, > > Martin > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tcpinc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc _______________________________________________ Tcpinc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
