Greetings, all, > On 31 Jul 2015, at 11:24, Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 2:20 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[email protected]> > wrote: > On Thu 2015-07-30 18:26:03 -0400, David Mazieres wrote: > > The new draft, called draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpeno-00 (TCP-ENO), is > > available at the following URL: > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpeno/ > > I like this proposal and i think it should be adopted by the WG. It > represents exactly the kind of convergence work people were arguing for > at the recent meeting. > > Can folks from the tcp-use-tls draft comment on whether they think they > could use this mechanism (or something we evolve from it as a group)? > > I think that separating out negotiation of the security protocol from the > protocol > itself is a really good idea (indeed, I suggested it a while ago and I would > have > no trouble splitting the TCP-use-TLS draft to use such a mechanism. > > I haven't had time to give this draft a close read but it looks like it's > headed in the > right direction.
I've read the draft. I may have a few tiny nits to pick with the details of the extension mechanism, and it's not clear to me that section 4 should be in this (Standards Track) document, instead of a separate informational API document. But the approach is a sound way forward, separate from the question of what an eventual TCPINC protocol looks like, and I would support its adoption as a working group item, should such a call for adoption be issued. Cheers, Brian > -Ekr > _______________________________________________ > Tcpinc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Tcpinc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
