Hi all, quick comment as a individual:
> Am 02.08.2015 um 22:18 schrieb David Mazieres > <[email protected]>: > > I think this is absolutely a valid concern. The working group should > not standardize two transport-layer protocols and use TCP-ENO to switch > between them. At the same time, I think we should be highly mindful of > future developments and needs. So that means that while we could have > written TCP-ENO as just a simple cipher-suite negotiation mechanism, we > also wanted to account for the possibility that TCPINC may need to > evolve in much more radical ways than just cipher suites. +1. I think there need to be a way to ‚update‘ most part of the approach. However, there should probably one basic approach where all implementation have to be backward compatible to. _______________________________________________ Tcpinc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
