Mirja K=C3=BChlewind <[email protected]> writes: > Hi David, > > I believe the point is, if you have already broken the tie via > out-of-band signal and both endpoints have already decided who will be > the opener (host A) and responder (host B), why do you still need to > write this information in the tcp-eno option if this information is > already known to the host?
Because without the "b" bit, TCP-ENO has no way of knowing that it's known to the host. I'm operating under the assumption that we still want to fall back to a working unencrypted TCP connection in the event that the endpoints do not properly break the tie. Is that not the case? David _______________________________________________ Tcpinc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
