I support adoption of this draft. -Ekr
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Eric Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > I support adoption (I am a co-author of the draft). > > Thanks, > -Eric Smith > > > On 9/26/15 1:06 AM, Mirja Kühlewind wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> as a quick reminder the adoption call for draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpeno-02 >> ends Monday night! >> >> Have a nice weekend! >> Mirja >> >> >> Am 15.09.2015 um 10:43 schrieb Mirja Kühlewind < >>> [email protected]>: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I'd like to start a call to ask for adoption as working group document of >>> >>> draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpeno-02. >>> >>> This is the third revision of draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpeno addressing >>> feedback >>> provided on the list over the last couple of weeks. Based on this >>> feedback and >>> the thereby indicated interest of the working group in this work, I >>> believe this document is ready to ask for adoption as a starting point to >>> work on a tcp >>> negotiation option (in a separate document for now). >>> >>> Please note that as always the adoption of this document does not mean >>> that we >>> have to publish it as it is, or publish it at all. The adoption only >>> means that >>> the working group is interested in continuing work on this approach now >>> and that the change rights go over to the working group such that we can >>> 'enforce' >>> changes as a group based on consensus. >>> >>> Please indicate until >>> >>> Monday, Sep 28, 2015 >>> >>> if you support the adoption of draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpeno-02 as working >>> group >>> document of not. >>> >>> As the chair I consider draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpeno in scope for the >>> charter. To >>> adopt draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpeno it is necessary that I see enough >>> interest and >>> energy in the working group to follow on with this work. Therefore >>> please simply indicate if you support this work. If you don't support this >>> work, I as a chair would be grateful, if you could provide some reasoning >>> for this. If there is enough energy to work on this document, I would only >>> consider strong technical flaws or any comments that show that this work >>> would be harmful for the goals of the working group as a reason to not >>> adopt the document. >>> >>> Thanks to all! >>> Mirja >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Tcpinc mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tcpinc mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc >> > > _______________________________________________ > Tcpinc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc >
_______________________________________________ Tcpinc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
