Has the WG discussed the applicability of
https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/writable-mib-module.html to Section 2.2?
I know that this question may be a bit unusal for TSV area and even more unusal
for this specific use case ;-)
Also, it may not apply to an informational document. But it could be worthwile
to review if CLI ("sysctl") is indeed the only known method in industry for
configuration of network elements implementing TCP.
Michael
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tcpinc [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of EXT Kyle
> Rose
> Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 2:10 PM
> To: tcpinc
> Subject: [tcpinc] Confirmation of consensus to adopt API document
>
> At the TCPINC session in Buenos Aires, there appeared to be consensus
> for the WG to adopt the API document, "Interface Extensions for
> TCP-ENO" (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bittau-tcpinc-api/):
> the chairs called for a show of hands, and somewhere around 8-10 hands
> were in favor with none opposed.
>
> We need to confirm this outcome on the list, so if you are opposed to
> adoption please post to the list by Friday April 15 at 20:00 GMT so we
> know to re-open the question. Otherwise, we'll consider the matter
> decided.
>
> Adopting this document will complete the second of the WG's four
> milestones.
>
> Thanks,
> Kyle (for David and Mirja)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tcpinc mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
_______________________________________________
Tcpinc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
