RFC 6897 Section 6.3 lists all related RFCs that I was aware of at when writing that one.
Michael -----Original Message----- From: Tcpinc [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of EXT Kyle Rose Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 4:21 PM To: Joe Touch Cc: tcpinc; Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE); David Mazieres expires 2016-07-10 PDT; EXT Stephen Farrell Subject: Re: [tcpinc] Confirmation of consensus to adopt API document > Not in an RFC, IMO. Doing so sets details of the interface in stone, > whether by declaration or implication. > > If you can't do it without that sort of example, IMO you have not > succeeded in the "abstract" part of an abstract API. Is there an example you'd recommend of an RFC that does this the right way? Kyle _______________________________________________ Tcpinc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc _______________________________________________ Tcpinc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
