o_O I've never seen that doc before, but it's impressively flat out wrong in more ways then I care to count. Anyone who reads that is stupider then before. -- Aaron Turner http://synfin.net/ Twitter: @synfinatic Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. -- Benjamin Franklin
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:15 PM, David Newman <dnew...@networktest.com> wrote: > On 4/3/14, 10:18 AM, Aaron Turner wrote: > >> Nope, no way to run tcpreplay on two machines that way. Basically, >> tcpreplay would need some way to synchronize the traffic between the >> two machines and it doesn't have that ability today. > > OK, thanks. > > There is this Cisco link advocating tcpreplay on two machines: > > https://supportforums.cisco.com/document/113811/cisco-waas-using-tcpreplay-application-testing > > Now that I understand tcpreplay better, this seems like a truly lousy > idea, unless one likes seeing ACKs arrive for datagrams that haven't > been sent yet. > > dn > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Tcpreplay-users mailing list > Tcpreplay-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tcpreplay-users > Support Information: http://tcpreplay.synfin.net/trac/wiki/Support ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Tcpreplay-users mailing list Tcpreplay-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tcpreplay-users Support Information: http://tcpreplay.synfin.net/trac/wiki/Support
