I don't see how multiple choice can give evidense of higher order cognitive process.   I'm not sure  what we mean by all the different "thinking" labels.  I use shape
as it is measureble, etc.  If all testing has advantages and disadvantages  why noy use some other method as the basis for evaluation?

Then how are thinking and learning adopting material related?  Should we expect both?

Del

klausner wrote:
Of course. Even multiple choice type exams can "measure" some of the higher order cognitive processes. It depends on the nature of the questions,naturally.
I prefer to use diverse multiple ways of evaluating students' understanding of concepts, theory, etc. All testing modalities have advantages and disadvantages.


Del Thomas Ph. D. wrote:


Del
Roberts, Keith wrote:
Several good suggestions have been made on this question.  One
possibility is to come to class the first day, offer several
possibilities, and have the students briefly discuss and then vote on
which approach will be used.  In the syllabus, it can say something
value like "daily preparation: xx points", and the options that they
would discuss and vote on are on a separate sheet. This discussion
becomes part of "negotiating the contract for the course" on the first
day and gives the students some sense of ownership, since they had
in-put.

Keith

  


Reply via email to