While media commentators were bemoaning the looting and showing the same footage over and over, not a word about the oil companies. There are an obvious number of points to be made here. Barbara Chasin

Del Thomas Ph. D. wrote:


You can see the structural "isms" in the coverage of this disaster. Who is trapped in the super dome and who has their picture taken looting. Poverty is as natural as Katrina.. The poor will always be with us because we insist on it.

Del

Brian Copp wrote:




In suggesting the contrast between the obvious causation of problems (homelessness) due to natural disasters vs the often cited individual failure causes for problems, I did not mean to neglect the other, and more difficult for the public to accept/understand models of causation, the so-called "structural" explanations. Disaster might be termed an immediate and obvious structural explanation to which the public shows sympathy and action, but the more subtle and complicated structural issues of class inequality, prejudice and discrimination (the isms), etc. do not receive popular public responses because, unless it is obvious (natural disaster), the public is much more comfortable with psychological (individualistic) explanation than sociological (structural). BEC

"Live an active not a reactive life."
                                        Carl Rogers
   Brian E. Copp, Ph.D.
   Professor
   Department of Sociology, Anthropology and Criminal Justice
   University of Wisconsin-River Falls
   KFA 330
   410 S. Third St.
   River Falls, WI 54022
   (715) 425-3992 or 3260,  FAX (715) 425-0657

Reply via email to