I haven't found that to be the case, but it depends on so many variables, course design, the instructor's involvement, etc. Task-oriented assignments are important, as well as collaborative work. As I mentioned in the previous e-mail, a big problem is gate keeping. For instance, I'm not sure what is meant by "real academic discourse?" How do we define what is or isn't "real discourse" and who is worthy of inclusion in that discussion?

Chris

Lutz Kaelber wrote:
Much of the discussion I have observed, both as a student and as an instructor, in on-line undergraduate courses without adult learners has been flat and superficial, or what I would call a postmodern simulacrum of real academic discourse (after all, it's the appearance, not the content, that counts). Students often stated their opinions without relating them to class materials. Task-oriented on-line assignments resulted in better outcomes.
 
Lutz

Reply via email to