Thank you Jan,

I raised these questions because some of the in class race exercises resulted in what I would call the Zimbardo effect.
Students discriminating in class whether the discrimination is based on hair color....or whatever could have unintended
as well as unmeasured learning.   We are very likely reinforcing the discrimination behavior..... is it R- or R+.  That would
likely vary from student to student within the same class. 

Can we expand subject to participants?  Should students receive "ethical" treatment.

I would agree that the Zimbardo experiment lasted too long.  However, I would see that as a error (judgment?)
more than ethical issue.  What were they thinking???????   Sadder still we as a society have not stopped this
treatment of the "lower participants" in schools, prisons, hospitals, etc.,  in the real world.

Some studies require blindness.  How should this be handled with regard to implied consent and deception?

Should students be told how and by whom the texts they purchase have been vetted?

Del



Jan Buhrmann wrote:
Del:

Both studies illustrate the importance of 1) informed consent of research 
subjects; 2) the critical issue of deception in social research; and 3) the 
importance of thorough and timely debriefing of research subjects.

The Milgram study did virtually no debriefing of subjects, employed a high 
degree of deception with subjects, and did not inform the subjects adequately 
about the nature of the study.  The Zimbardo study did a better job of both 
informed consent, as well as thorough and timely debriefing of subjects, but 
allowed the experiment to continue far longer than was in the best interest of 
the research subjects, causing more harm (according to Zimbardo himself) than 
was necessary.

There is a fairly recent remake of the Milgram experiment on video 
("Obedience," Insight Media, 1996), that I show to my classes.  It's short, 
but very much to the point.  It ends rather abruptly, but for this reason 
makes an excellent 'jumping off point' for a more thorough discussion of the 
importance of social scientists using all precautions to conduct their 
research ethically and humanely.  In addition, the updated video of the 
Zimbardo study ("Quiet Rage," Stanford Institutional Television Network) 
includes an interview with Phillip Zimbardo just a few years ago where he 
recounts the ethical implications of his earlier experiment.

Hope this is helpful,

 - Jan Buhrmann

==============================
Jan Buhrmann, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Illinois College
1101 W. College Ave
Jacksonville, IL 62650
(217)245-3877
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


  
===== Original Message From Del Thomas Ph D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> =====
Jan,

What do these two studies have to do with ethics in research?

Del

Jan Buhrmann wrote:
    
These two experiments are also useful for illustrating and teaching about
ethics (or the lack thereof) in social research.

Thanks for sharing this information on tonight's program!

 - Jan Buhrmann

==========================
Jan Buhrmann, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Department of Sociology
Illinois College
(217)245-3877
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




      
===== Original Message From "Klein, Lloyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
        
=====
  
Anyone engaged in teaching the topic of obedience and social control may 
        
want
  
to check out a documentary screening on both Court TV and the Sundance 
      
Channel
  
tonight at 10 eastern time (adjust for your own time zone).  The Human
Behavior Experiments documentary focuses on the Milgram and Zimbardo
experiments.  As you may know, the Zimbardo prison experiment was cited as 
      
an
  
explanation of the behavior at Abu Ghraib. Zimbardo offers more information 
      
on
  
his own website.  In addition, the documentary covers an infamous incident 
      
at
  
a McDonald's restaurant in Mt. Washington, Kentucky. Other cases are also
cited.  For more information, check out a rather informative television 
      
review
  
in today's edition of the New York Times.

      
Lloyd Klein

        
      
      

    



  

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Teaching Sociology" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/teachsoc
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to