Heh, yeah mediawiki.org is probably best and generally good as a default for engineering related stuff, unless there's something truly private.
I've never been really sure which wiki is best for what, and now I just pretend there's only mediawiki and office, using the above rubric, and generally pretend the others don't exist :-P On Oct 15, 2013 6:42 PM, "Toby Negrin" <[email protected]> wrote: > I'll defer to Arthur on this but I don't have any issues with it. I find > that's it quite difficult to know what wiki to use for a particular use > case. > > -Toby > > On Oct 15, 2013, at 6:20 PM, Ryan Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > > Is there any way we can use mediawiki.org (or wikitech, or meta, or any > public wiki) for this? Unless of course we expect to have private > information listed in these notes. > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Toby Negrin <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi folks, >> >> We had our inaugural scrum of scrums meeting today [0]. This meeting is >> designed to identify integration points and blockers between teams. >> >> Here are the notes from this week's meeting: >> >> https://office.wikimedia.org/wiki/Engineering/Scrum_of_Scrums >> >> Next steps are for Arthur (facilitator) and myself to review the list for >> dependencies and figure out the best way to capture this information. But >> by all means don't wait for us! >> >> -Toby >> >> [0] >> https://office.wikimedia.org/wiki/Engineering/Scrum_of_Scrums#Meeting_Description >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Engineering mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/engineering >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > teampractices mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices > >
_______________________________________________ teampractices mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices
