On Wed, 3 Dec 2014, at 12:18, Bryan Davis wrote: > On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Anne Gomez <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm just starting to look at moving fr-tech to phabricator and have been > > wondering these questions to myself (along with the other thread about > > teams). I'm wondering if it might make sense to have a project for bug > > tracking that is public/open and a project for just the internal team to > > work on that would include the sprint board and not allow editing by others. > > I'd personally like to see everyone default to open rather than closed > groups.
+1 > If there is significant spam or griefing then closed groups > might be the only recourse, but assume good faith and embrace the > openness that we are allowed in our organizational structure. Spam should not be an issue - there's plenty of volunteers who'd be happy to offer a hand. What is «griefing»? Sounds like something out of the ordinary (bottom line, it would force people to make things read-only and invite-only), but not hide them from the public view. _______________________________________________ teampractices mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices
