On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 3:48 AM, Jakob Warkotsch < [email protected]> wrote:
> These features might sound familiar if you have heard of the Phabricator > Sprint extension that Christopher Johnson is working on here at WMDE. > Unlike this Phabricator Sprint extension, Phragile only needs access to > Phabricator's API and OAuth Server but has no dependencies on its code and > can be deployed externally. > Why is this a benefit? If it's hard to deploy Phabricator improvements, we should fix that. Having a solution that works inside Phab seems to have a better probability of long term success if it's useful to other Phabricator users as well. I worry that we're creating too many solutions for the same problem, again, instead of sticking to one and making it work. Does WMDE intend to deprecate the Sprint extension? -- Erik Möller VP of Product & Strategy, Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________ teampractices mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices
