On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Kevin Smith wrote: > > I'm trying to figure out what benefits the Epic tag actually > > provides, and so far I haven't thought of any.
Specifically about the "Epic" tag, see https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/teampractices/2014-December/000566.html > > Several teams are putting [EPIC] or EPIC: or [ > > title of epics, all of which do a better job of identifying epics than the > > Epic tag. The tag is only visible when you view the detail, whereas a > > freeform text identifier in the title is visible in workboards, lists, and > > even email notifications. Related: There is currently no way to customize the display of cards on boards; see https://secure.phabricator.com/T4863 What I see is that people add such "[epic]" prefix tags but they do not always also add the "epic" tag to such tasks [1]. The more such prefix tag cases exist, the shorter the display of the actual task summary might get. Cheers, andre [1] Some tasks where I added the "epic" tag in addition to that tag being in the task summary: T99953,T98054,T97458,T98873,T95571 -- Andre Klapper | Wikimedia Bugwrangler http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ _______________________________________________ teampractices mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices
