On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Antoine Musso <[email protected]> wrote:
> When I look at the korma page, the two first pages are for MediaWiki > extensions that have been abandoned ages ago. Either because it was a > one time proof of concept or it has migrated to GitHub. If we could > archive / move to an attic all the bitrotting repositories that will > surely help. > If that is true, then the old open reviews that are making those repositories show up can be safely abandoned, right? There is no point in keeping open reviews in abandoned / migrated repositories. > mediawiki/core itself has 500+ open changes or a good third of the debt. > If one could generate a list of changes per authors and then ask each > author to move its patches forward, that would help. > > Remember the main reason to have a premerge review workflow was to put > the responsibility of review in the hands of the author. If people > don't babysit their patches, there is not much we can do I guess. > As said, -1 and WIP are already filtered in those metrics. The patches you see are either 0 or +1. The way to tell authors to move patches forward is by posting -1 with a comment of what is missing. -- Quim Gil Engineering Community Manager @ Wikimedia Foundation http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Qgil
_______________________________________________ teampractices mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices
