Joking aside, I'm not too concerned with the overloadedness of terms we use, as long as we have consensus on what they mean.
I'd be much more excited to define the thing that we're designating as MMP, i.e. "the bundle of features that satisfy user stories X, Y, and Z". On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 9:10 AM, James Douglas <[email protected]> wrote: > Model View Presenter? :] > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Kind of a small issue, but I find myself leaning toward MMP (Minimum >> Marketable Product) rather than MVP (Minimum Viable Product). Although I >> prefer "viable", and MVP is catchy, it is also confusing and ambiguous, >> thanks to MVP (Most Valuable Player). >> >> Am I alone in preferring an acronym that isn't overloaded? >> >> >> Kevin Smith >> Agile Coach >> Wikimedia Foundation >> >> >> >> *Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in >> the sum of all knowledge. That's our commitment. Help us make it a reality.* >> >> _______________________________________________ >> teampractices mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices >> >> >
_______________________________________________ teampractices mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices
